On other issues, the ones where my roots have gone to a
deadly depth, I like that the wall is there. I do not touch it, but I cherish
the separation from those that disagree with me. It feels safe among those who
don’t challenge me and, like myself, have become content to be stuck there free
from new perspectives. I like to know what I stand for. It also feels stifling,
though, and I long for new information. Here’s where the other side could
kindly toss us a bit of manure, which would at first appear revolting, but
might just give us the growth that we needed.
Sadly, the wall/fence is just too high and wide. What I’m
saying here is that when it comes to forming opinions, maybe we should be extremely
careful, but careful of extremes. In both the above scenarios, the wall felt
safe, but safe from what? Others’ judgement? Being wrong? Making mistakes?
Being alone? Maybe the safety of the wall serves a good purpose, but maybe not.
What if the wall did not exist? What if we stood on the boundary between
opinions, not above the fight on the fence like a coward, but on the ground
firmly and confidently, and look each other in the eyes.
Look each other in the eyes.
Not to intimidate. Not to glare. But to step for a minute into another’s world. Who
are they? And why do they believe the way they do? Let’s tear down the wall, or
at the very least, create a few peepholes.
That's poetic
ReplyDelete